Framing the Conversation
Case Studies and Thoughts on the Communications Industry
Mistakes That Damage Credibility
Strong communication is essential for credibility, yet common mistakes can undermine trust. Lack of clarity, inconsistent messaging, and overpromising create confusion and skepticism. Ignoring audience feedback and using excessive jargon alienate stakeholders, while poor crisis communication and failure to address mistakes erode confidence.
The Canada Line Controversy
The Canada Line controversy demonstrates the cost of poor communication in infrastructure projects. Originally promised as an underground system, it shifted to cut-and-cover construction, disrupting businesses and sparking lawsuits. While courts ruled against financial compensation, trust and goodwill were lost, damaging relationships between stakeholders and developers.
The Cost of Miscommunication
A simple conversation led to a costly misunderstanding on a construction project. A business owner was promised roadwork at no cost—until that promise disappeared.
The 2022 Rogers Outage
The 2022 Rogers outage disrupted internet, wireless, and banking services across Canada, affecting millions of customers, emergency services, and businesses. Beyond the technical failure, poor crisis communication worsened the situation. Rogers delayed its response, lacked transparency, and failed to reassure customers, leading to public frustration and loss of trust.
CIBC’s $30 Million Fine
CIBC was fined $30 million for failing to prevent employees, including executives, from using unapproved communication methods like personal texts for business. The case underscores regulatory focus on compliance and the consequences of weak internal controls.
Framing the Conversation is a space dedicated to exploring best practices, challenges, and lessons in the communications industry. Whether analyzing real-world case studies or discussing broader communication principles, this series dives into what makes messaging effective and how organizations can build credibility through clear, transparent, and strategic communication.
Through this series, we examine the pitfalls that organizations often encounter, such as inconsistent messaging, lack of transparency, and failure to listen to stakeholders. By identifying these common issues, we highlight ways to improve communication strategies, both in public and corporate settings. We also look at case studies from various industries, analyzing how companies, government agencies, and public figures handle communication challenges. From crisis response to proactive messaging, these examples offer valuable insights into what works and what doesn't when engaging with the public, customers, or employees.
Beyond crisis management, Framing the Conversation covers topics such as effective stakeholder engagement, digital communication trends, and the role of social media in shaping public perception. Our goal is to provide actionable takeaways that help professionals refine their communication strategies, build trust, and enhance their messaging.
By learning from past successes and failures, organizations can strengthen their communication approach. Stay tuned as we continue to explore the evolving landscape of the communications industry.